Tuesday

Multnomah Bar Association: Young Lawyers Section




Posted by at
Labels:

6 comments:

  1. Lainie Decker11:25 AM

    In terms of the top 2, I probably prefer the version with the lines, unless we change the other version to eliminate some of the white space. I like version 3 with the committees as spokes. I take it this means the committee names as a border didn't work?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Christiane Fife11:31 AM

    I like version 3 with the spokes. It gets the message across in a visually appealling way without too much text. I think that versions 1 and 2 still compete too much with the front of the card.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unknown12:38 PM

    I like the version with the lines, though I agree--it competes with the front side. I like the spokes, too. Simple and non-competing. I think we submit 1 and 3 to the Board for a decision.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lainie2:41 PM

    Sounds like a plan! Emily, can you send a new email with a PDF of the current version of the front and those 2 versions of the back? Thanks so much!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Emily4:09 PM

    Hi Lainie,

    I guess I didn't understand how to use the committee names as a border. Would they read sideways and upside-down, too? I like the spoke version as an alternative. If you are happy with it, then we'll push forward.

    Thanks! I'm sending PDF files next.
    Emily

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emily1:54 PM

    Hi guys,
    How are we coming along for approval to print these cards? When is the actual due date?
    Emily

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)